AG-R06: Statistical Reporting — Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Correct Test Reporting for GMJ

What to Report for Each Statistical Test and How to Avoid Common Errors

Authors

Keywords:

statistical reporting, effect size, confidence interval, p-value, logistic regression, t-test, survival analysis, biostatistics, research methods, GMJ Academy

Abstract

The GMJ Author Toolkit (AG-R06) provides a structured, self-contained guide to statistical reporting in accordance with the Georgian Medical Journal’s submission standards. The guide ensures accurate, transparent, and reproducible reporting of statistical results across all manuscript types.

The document is organized into three components: (1) theoretical foundations explaining the three required elements for every statistical result — effect size, 95% confidence interval, and p-value — along with correct reporting formats for common statistical tests; (2) a comprehensive pre-submission checklist ensuring completeness, correct interpretation, and adherence to reporting standards; and (3) a complete worked example demonstrating correct and incorrect reporting for logistic regression, t-tests, and survival analysis.

Particular emphasis is placed on reporting effect sizes with confidence intervals, assessing normality for continuous variables, and avoiding common errors such as reporting p-values without effect sizes or confidence intervals. The guide also highlights the distinction between statistical and clinical significance and reinforces the need for transparent reporting of all results, including non-significant findings.

This resource supports authors in producing clear, accurate, and publication-ready statistical reporting for submission to the Georgian Medical Journal.

References

[1] Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size — or why the p value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279-82.

[2] Altman DG, Bland JM. Standard deviations and standard errors. BMJ. 2005;331(7521):903.

[3] Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-6.

[4] Strasak AM, Zaman Q, Pfeiffer KP, Gobel G, Ulmer H. Statistical errors in medical research — a review of common pitfalls. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137(3-4):44-9.

Cover image of the GMJ Author Toolkit (AG-R06) titled “Statistical Reporting,” published by the Georgian Medical Journal (2026). The design illustrates statistical analysis including effect sizes, confidence intervals, p-values, and graphical data representation, representing correct statistical reporting in academic research.

Published

04/12/2026

How to Cite

Pkhakadze, G. (2026). AG-R06: Statistical Reporting — Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Correct Test Reporting for GMJ: What to Report for Each Statistical Test and How to Avoid Common Errors. Georgian Medical Journal, 1–6. Retrieved from https://gmj.ge/index.php/pub/article/view/106

Issue

Section

GMJ Academy Series

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>