AG-R09: AI Use in Research — Disclosure Requirements, Ethical Standards, and GMJ Policy

What Must Be Disclosed, How to Write the Statement, and What Is Not Permitted

Authors

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, AI disclosure, research ethics, ICMJE AI policy, COPE AI guidelines, AI hallucination, academic publishing, scientific writing, GMJ Academy

Abstract

The GMJ Author Toolkit (AG-R09) provides a structured, self-contained guide to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research and manuscript preparation in accordance with the Georgian Medical Journal’s submission standards and international ethical guidelines. The guide ensures transparency, accountability, and compliance with ICMJE and COPE recommendations.

The document is organized into three components: (1) theoretical foundations defining types of AI tools, distinguishing between uses that require disclosure and those that do not, and outlining three non-negotiable journal rules; (2) a comprehensive pre-submission checklist ensuring that all AI-assisted content is disclosed, verified, and compliant; and (3) complete worked examples demonstrating correct disclosure statements for writing, literature search, translation, and non-use scenarios.

Particular emphasis is placed on mandatory disclosure when AI tools influence intellectual or analytical content, the prohibition of AI authorship, and the requirement that all AI-generated content — including references — be verified manually. The guide also highlights risks such as AI hallucinations and ethical violations arising from non-disclosure.

This resource supports authors in producing transparent, ethically compliant, and publication-ready manuscripts for submission to the Georgian Medical Journal.

References

[1] International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). New ICMJE recommendations: use of AI in scientific publications [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/

[2] Committee on Publication Ethics. Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author

[3] Stokel-Walker C, Van Noorden R. What ChatGPT and generative AI means for science. Nature. 2023;614(7947):214-6.

[4] Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023;379(6630):313.

[5] Lund BD, Wang T. Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI language models shape the future of medical writing? Clin Radiol. 2023;78(4):e279-e281.

Cover image of the GMJ Author Toolkit (AG-R09) titled “AI Use in Research,” published by the Georgian Medical Journal (2026). The design illustrates AI-assisted research workflows, disclosure requirements, and human verification processes, representing ethical and transparent use of AI in academic publishing.

Published

04/12/2026

How to Cite

Pkhakadze, G. (2026). AG-R09: AI Use in Research — Disclosure Requirements, Ethical Standards, and GMJ Policy: What Must Be Disclosed, How to Write the Statement, and What Is Not Permitted. Georgian Medical Journal, 1–7. Retrieved from https://gmj.ge/index.php/pub/article/view/109

Issue

Section

GMJ Academy Series

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>