Epidemiology of eye diseases in Georgia: a 15-year descriptive analysis (2007–2022)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66636/gmj.v1.i3.a133

Keywords:

eye diseases, ophthalmology, epidemiology, Georgia, glaucoma, cataract, refractive errors, rude incidence rate, NCDC, universal health coverage

Abstract

Background Epidemiology is a cornerstone of public health. Without epidemiological data, it is impossible to determine the origin, frequency, aetiology, and risk factors of diseases, or to inform public health programmes and preventive policies. No comprehensive epidemiological study of eye diseases in Georgia had previously been conducted.

Aim To analyse the epidemiology of eye diseases in Georgia over a 15-year period (2007–2022), stratified by region and three distinct sub-periods defined by major health-system and contextual events.

Methods Fifteen-year data from the National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health (NCDC) electronic database were analysed using MS Excel and SPSS. Crude incidence rates (per 100 000 population) were calculated for four disease categories (ICD-10 codes H00–H59, H25–H28, H40–H42, H52) across three periods: 2007–2012 (pre-universal health coverage), 2013–2019 (post-universal health coverage, pre-COVID-19), and 2020–2022 (COVID-19 pandemic).

Results Crude rates for all eye disease categories increased markedly from 2007–2012 to 2013–2019, likely reflecting improved registration following the introduction of universal health coverage. Rates declined substantially in 2020–2022, consistent with reduced healthcare utilisation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regional variation was pronounced across all three periods and all disease categories. Tbilisi and Imereti consistently showed the highest rates in the 2013–2019 period, while regions with historically lower rates likely reflect access disparities rather than lower true disease burden.

Conclusions This is the first structured epidemiological analysis of eye disease incidence in Georgia for 2007–2022. The data are now available to researchers and clinicians. Improved access to ophthalmic services is recommended in regions with persistently low detection rates.

Keywords: eye diseases; ophthalmology; epidemiology; Georgia; glaucoma; cataract; refractive errors; crude incidence rate; NCDC; universal health coverage

References

Public Health Ontario. Epidemiology: Tell Me More. Toronto: Public Health Ontario; 2022. Available from: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/About/News/2022/Epidemiology-Tell-Me-More

GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144-e160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7

Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(12):e1221-e1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5

Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081-2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013

Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, Pakzad R, Ostadimoghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018;30(1):3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009

Liang J, Pu Y, Chen J, Liu M, Ouyang B, Jin Z, et al. Global prevalence, trend and projection of myopia in children and adolescents from 1990 to 2050: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2025;109(3):362-371. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325427

Jiang B, Wu T, Liu W, Liu G. Changing trends in the global burden of cataract over the past 30 years: retrospective observational study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023;9:e47349. https://doi.org/10.2196/47349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/47349

Richardson E, Berdzuli N. Georgia: Health System Review. Health Syst Transit. 2017;19(4):1-222.

Li JO, Liu H, Ting DSJ, Jeon S, Chan RVP, Kim JE, et al. Digital technology, tele-medicine and artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a global perspective. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;82:100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100900

World Health Organization. World report on vision. Geneva: WHO; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516570

Resnikoff S, Jonas JB, Friedman D, He M, Ablordeppey R, Parodi MB, et al. Myopia-a 21st century public health issue. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(3):Mi1-Mi3. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-27119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25983

Downloads

Published

08/18/2026

How to Cite

Tabatadze, S., & Tkhelidze, N. (2026). Epidemiology of eye diseases in Georgia: a 15-year descriptive analysis (2007–2022). Georgian Medical Journal, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.66636/gmj.v1.i3.a133

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.