Epidemiology of eye diseases in Georgia: a 15-year descriptive analysis (2007–2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66636/gmj.v1.i3.a133Keywords:
eye diseases, ophthalmology, epidemiology, Georgia, glaucoma, cataract, refractive errors, rude incidence rate, NCDC, universal health coverageAbstract
Background Epidemiology is a cornerstone of public health. Without epidemiological data, it is impossible to determine the origin, frequency, aetiology, and risk factors of diseases, or to inform public health programmes and preventive policies. No comprehensive epidemiological study of eye diseases in Georgia had previously been conducted.
Aim To analyse the epidemiology of eye diseases in Georgia over a 15-year period (2007–2022), stratified by region and three distinct sub-periods defined by major health-system and contextual events.
Methods Fifteen-year data from the National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health (NCDC) electronic database were analysed using MS Excel and SPSS. Crude incidence rates (per 100 000 population) were calculated for four disease categories (ICD-10 codes H00–H59, H25–H28, H40–H42, H52) across three periods: 2007–2012 (pre-universal health coverage), 2013–2019 (post-universal health coverage, pre-COVID-19), and 2020–2022 (COVID-19 pandemic).
Results Crude rates for all eye disease categories increased markedly from 2007–2012 to 2013–2019, likely reflecting improved registration following the introduction of universal health coverage. Rates declined substantially in 2020–2022, consistent with reduced healthcare utilisation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regional variation was pronounced across all three periods and all disease categories. Tbilisi and Imereti consistently showed the highest rates in the 2013–2019 period, while regions with historically lower rates likely reflect access disparities rather than lower true disease burden.
Conclusions This is the first structured epidemiological analysis of eye disease incidence in Georgia for 2007–2022. The data are now available to researchers and clinicians. Improved access to ophthalmic services is recommended in regions with persistently low detection rates.
Keywords: eye diseases; ophthalmology; epidemiology; Georgia; glaucoma; cataract; refractive errors; crude incidence rate; NCDC; universal health coverage
References
Public Health Ontario. Epidemiology: Tell Me More. Toronto: Public Health Ontario; 2022. Available from: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/About/News/2022/Epidemiology-Tell-Me-More
GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144-e160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7
Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(12):e1221-e1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5
Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081-2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, Pakzad R, Ostadimoghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018;30(1):3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009
Liang J, Pu Y, Chen J, Liu M, Ouyang B, Jin Z, et al. Global prevalence, trend and projection of myopia in children and adolescents from 1990 to 2050: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2025;109(3):362-371. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325427
Jiang B, Wu T, Liu W, Liu G. Changing trends in the global burden of cataract over the past 30 years: retrospective observational study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023;9:e47349. https://doi.org/10.2196/47349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/47349
Richardson E, Berdzuli N. Georgia: Health System Review. Health Syst Transit. 2017;19(4):1-222.
Li JO, Liu H, Ting DSJ, Jeon S, Chan RVP, Kim JE, et al. Digital technology, tele-medicine and artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a global perspective. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;82:100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100900
World Health Organization. World report on vision. Geneva: WHO; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516570
Resnikoff S, Jonas JB, Friedman D, He M, Ablordeppey R, Parodi MB, et al. Myopia-a 21st century public health issue. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(3):Mi1-Mi3. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-27119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25983
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Salome Tabatadze, Nino Tkhelidze

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
You are free to: share and adapt the work for any purpose, even commercially.
Conditions: provide appropriate credit to the authors and the Georgian Medical Journal (GMJ), link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. Do not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits.
Licence: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 · Legal code: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Third-party material. Images or other content credited to a third party are not covered by CC BY 4.0; permission must be obtained from the rights holder for reuse beyond statutory exceptions.
Authors' rights. Authors retain copyright. First publication rights are granted to GMJ.
Data and code. Where provided, datasets or code may carry their own licences; please follow the licence stated in the article or repository record.




















